Thursday, February 21, 2008

NY Times 1 - John McCain 0

Here's a quote from John McCain's communications director about the NY Times article alleging McCain had an inappropriate relationship with a lobbyist:

"It is a shame that The New York Times has lowered its standards to engage in a hit and run smear campaign," communications director Jill Hazelbaker said in a prepared statement sent about an hour after the Times posted their story online. "John McCain has a 24-year record of serving our country with honor and integrity. He has never violated the public trust, never done favors for special interests or lobbyists, and he will not allow a smear campaign to distract from the issues at stake in this election."

I actually like McCain, but good old Jill may be over-stating her case a bit. Here's the relevant section from McCain's Wikipedia entry:

"McCain's upwards political trajectory was jolted when he became enmeshed in the Keating Five scandal of the 1980s... Between 1982 and 1987, McCain received approximately $112,000 in political contributions from Keating and his associates. In addition, McCain's wife and her father had invested $359,100 in a Keating shopping center in April 1986, a year before McCain met with the regulators. McCain, his family and baby-sitter made at least nine trips at Keating's expense, sometimes aboard the American Continental jet...

Eventually [Keating's] real estate venture failed, leaving many broke. Federal regulators ultimately filed a $1.1 billion civil racketeering and fraud suit against Keating, accusing him of siphoning Lincoln's deposits to his family and into political campaigns. The five senators came under investigation for attempting to influence the regulators. In the end, none of the senators were convicted of any crime, although McCain was rebuked by the Senate Ethics Committee for exercising "poor judgment" for intervening with the federal regulators on behalf of Keating."

Labels: ,

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Thursday, February 14, 2008

Hillary Hating 101

From the NY Times today:

"Hillary does better with blue-collar voters, working-class voters, union members," said Senator Sherrod Brown, the Ohio Democrat who has not endorsed anyone in the race. "Barack does better among African-Americans and younger voters and upper-income voters. If that holds, Ohio tilts toward Hillary."

Why is it that Hillary does well with down-market voters in the Democratic Party and yet appears to be despised by large numbers of down-market voters in the Republican Party and in the general population?

Or is Hillary-hating actually a middle / upper-class conservative issue?

Labels:

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Friday, February 1, 2008

Giants to Win, Simmons to Eat Crow

Bill Simmons, The Sports Guy at ESPN.com, predicts a Giant whooping: Patriots 42 - Giants 17. Given his record this season 118-129-9, I'm even more confident than usual that the Giants will at least beat the 12 point spread.

Sorry, Bill. You're a great writer but you can't pick winners.

Labels: ,

AddThis Social Bookmark Button